« Bloggercon has begun | Main | Death threats against Iranian bloggers are coming from.... a blog. »

November 07, 2004

B-con: journalism session

Led by Scott Rosenberg of salon.com (his preparatory notes for the session are here).

I'm updating & re-saving this post as the conversation unfolds.

Issues raised by people in the room:

What is "standard journalistic practice"?  Is it still relevant? Does one continue to exist and should it in this new era of blogging?

Issues of journalistic standards: the process of journalism vs. the tools and technical formats.

Question of objectivity: is it relevant? Or should we focus more on transparency and knowing where your biases are?

The line between journalism and advocacy and p.r.

Is there something special about journalism? Should those aspiring to be doing journalism use a specific label showing they adhere to certain "standards" - whatever those are?

One person from a p.r. company: "blogs communicate the interest of actual users and readers."

How can blogs maintain their independent voice as an alternative media and avoid the mainstream media's insularity .

How blogging is helping to bring out the individual voices of journalists.

The tools for newsgathering are now on everybody's computers. So how do you use those tools in ways that are responsible.

Question of bloggers rehashing internet sources and not doing original "legwork" - the difference between blogging and news reporting?

Local blogging: covering issues in local communities that local mainstream media simply isn't covering.

Value in the meta-analysis of being one step away and not having "stockholm syndrome" relationship to the people you cover (example as Pentagon journalists).

We should not be looking at the situation as "either-or" but rather as a mesh. How blogs and professional journalism can complement one another.

From the AP's Jim Kennedy. Blogs show that finally the audience wants to talk back. This is a great opprotunity for the media and its audience to hold conversations. The zero-sum, "us vs. them" is not useful.

Scott: maybe the better way to look at it is "it's just us."

Dave Winer: making generalizations about bloggers is not useful.

Common problem for both bloggers and pros: the difference between opinion and newsgathering.

Jay Rosen: its through arguments and debates that many people get interested in certain news stories.

J.D. Lasica - insularity of mass media vs. inclusiveness of blogs. secrecy of the news room vs. transparency of blogosphere. citizens must start taking back our media and one of the ways we can do this is through blogs.  (see "ourmedia.org")

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c609853ef00d8353fd62f69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference B-con: journalism session:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

About

AddThis Feed Button

Global Voices


  • Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?

  • Donate to Global Voices - Help us spread the word