Blogger Corps?
At various sessions of Bloggercon III, I opined that we need to think more about how blogging tools and the blogging process can be used by the non-profit and activist community - not only in the U.S. but around the world. This is not merely a matter of blog-evangelizing to the uninitiated. It's also about adapting blog tools and blogging techniques to the needs of people who want to go beyond online conversations to real-world action. For early blog-adopters, blogging was an end in itself. For the activist community, blogging has to be an effective means to a concrete end.
In the final wrap-up session of Bloggercon III, I suggested that socially conscious members of the blogging community (of all political persuasions) might want to organize a "Blogger Corps." Through it, bloggers could donate their time to help poorly funded activists or non-profit groups to figure out what blogging tools are right for them, set up blogs, and develop effective blogging strategies.
The response to this idea was enthusiastic. A few people have contacted me, asking how they can help. I do not have any detailed master plan. I just came up with the idea at B-con and blurted it out. So I turn to the blogosphere (and the non-profit world) for suggestions: what do you think would be the most effective and efficient way to organize a Blogger Corps? Please share your ideas in the "comments" section.


Count me in too !
Posted by: Loic | November 15, 2004 at 06:07 PM
Great idea, how can I help? Propably a wiki-like beginner's manual and/or adopt-a-blogger might work :)
So experienced bloggers could help others with advice, or help them set up their blogs.
Posted by: Moe | November 15, 2004 at 06:36 PM
Maybe it'd be appropriate to have a bloggercorps blog. Unfortunately, bloggercorps.com/org are being squatted.
Posted by: David Weinberger | November 15, 2004 at 09:06 PM
David,
Good idea.
Fortunately, I know the person who has those domans and he's on our side, ready to help.
R
Posted by: Rebecca | November 15, 2004 at 09:17 PM
Blogs and wikis have loomed large in all of my activism for the last three or four years. To abstract it one level and have a tech-squad that supports activists by introducing and supporting these tools seems like a big challenge in coalition building. Would there be three squads -- left-tech, right-tech, and center-tech? No, I think embedded blogging is the way to go, and we each have to find our own assignment by folowing what's in our heart.
Posted by: fp | November 15, 2004 at 09:19 PM
Whereas I think blogging for organizations is a good thing, and any online communication for non-profits is a good thing, most blogs aren't exactly a bastion of good web design (and in this sense, I'm not thinking of only visuals, moreso I'm talking in regards to the other important factors). Let's hope these groups continue to seek professional help in regards to the rest of their sites. Blogs are great on their own for individuals, for organizations, they have greater needs. So, to be positive, this effort needs to be only a part of a bigger effort.
Posted by: ~bc | November 15, 2004 at 09:39 PM
I'm on board, and I suggest that the Activist Technology group (http://activist-tech.org) might provide a good 'home' for the project. I set up an email list for discussion, blogcorps@activist-tech.org. To join, send a blank email to blogcorps-subscribe at activist-tech.org.
Posted by: Jon Lebkowsky | November 15, 2004 at 10:57 PM
Great idea, Rebecca. I've been basically doing this very thing one-org-at-a-time for several years. First by setting up websites for nonprofits, and now by advocating furiously for their use of blogs.
When I talk to community-based and state-based NPOs we often come up with some potential uses for blogs that I've never seen done before. For example, a statewide gun control network could use it to publish the first-person stories of people affected by violence all across North Carolina. This would empower the writers to tell their community' stories, show others they're not alone, demonstrate the power of collective voices, and serve as a lobbying tool to push for legislative change.
This is just an example of how the creative implementation of blogs can help organizations and create positive social change.
Also we are hernessing the power of blogs for social change at the local level (where you can really make a difference) at OrangePolitics.org
Posted by: Ruby Sinreich | November 15, 2004 at 11:35 PM
This is a terrific idea. Looking forward to hearing the next iterations of this.
We can probably use TechSoup.org as a way to reach some of the nonprofit audience this corp would be aimed at.
Posted by: marnie webb | November 16, 2004 at 12:58 AM
Gary Chapman and Lodis Rhodes at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin have been exploring applications for technologies for social good with their grad students for several years. You should check out their website - http://www.communitynetworking.org/ - for background papers and links to other folks doing similar work. I'm glad to see more interest in this area - thanks for getting the conversation started.
Posted by: sarah | November 16, 2004 at 01:35 AM
When I was at the Clark campaign, we registered blogcorps.com, blogcorps.org and blogcorps.net becuase we had the idea of building a "Peace Corps-like" group of bloggers and techies. The domains are still owned by the campaign but controlled by Josh Lerner, who was the CTO of the campaign.
These domains are set to expire in a few weeks, but I can request he transfer them to me or someone else unless he has a different use for them -- which is unlikely.
Posted by: Cameron Barrett | November 16, 2004 at 01:48 AM
Simply wonderful!!! I spent the weekend with a group of African-American political and business leaders and was stunned at the lack of blog-sense! I am already giving them my time to get them up to speed. Can't imagine more groups don't need help. Count me in!
Posted by: Keith Jenkins | November 16, 2004 at 12:20 PM
The trouble with blogs being that they are too easy to set up... organizations should consider a more manageable community information structure that's not bound to the blog concept, like the Civ. Civ's can handle the "me too" posts...
But I'm just a non-blogging heretic here to cause trouble. :-)
Jon
Posted by: Jon Garfunkel | November 16, 2004 at 02:26 PM
Yep -- I'm also here! I'm wondering with the diversity of ideas, how organized does this really need to be?
Posted by: Trudy W. Schuett | November 16, 2004 at 05:11 PM
I don't necesarily think this is the model you're looking for, but...
I've been encouraging new bloggers by, without any advance warning, creating a free blogspot/blogger blog for people who I think might make good bloggers. I then "give" it to them, no strings attached, show them how easy it is to make a post, offer to be unlimited tech support, and then let them post or not, no pressure.
Of the nine people I've done this for, only one has taken off.
http://concretefrog.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Jack Hodgson | November 17, 2004 at 03:44 AM
I think that each application would be best served by the principals sitting down and developing a good picture of what kinds of interactions, workflow, etc. that they would like to have their collaboration application support, then modeling it, say using storyboarding, and then the developer(s) can build a schema from that and an application on top of that. Its not rocket science.
Blogs are basically content management systems and although many of them, like MovableType, have been quite successful at approximating an effective schema for what they do and then implementing it, at best they are still just approximations of what would be best for a given situation.
If people allowed themselves the flexibility to dream big dreams as far as what they could use, there are definitely people who would love to help them build it.
There are lots of ways of communicating and then, displaying and adding to those communications.
When I first confronted the WWW, it was being hyped as a medium for scientists, who would share, and annotate, all different kinds of information. The annotation took a while to happen. Thats basically where we are today, with the blogging explosion.
Its really just one phase in a process, even if it is a very important one. Computer-mediated communications is clearly here to stay and indeed, it *does* change everything.
The tools we build don't even necessarily have to be based on HTML-ish text which is read on demand, asynchronously. They could easily be audio and video.. even in realtime.
What we can do to facilitate the maximum amount of flexibility is to design these future protocols with that in mind. So bloggers won't necessarily look at 'channels' of information in the same way. We will be able to choose how we interact with it.
But blogs are a good start because they have gotten us talking about and experimenting with the various possibilities.
Here's where I think it will end up.. My first exposure to 'cyberspace', as a child, was a global world of two-way audio communications. I always have thought the Internet would eventually get there, to what I would describe as really an immersive experience. Imagine opening up the computer's power, blog-like spaces, even, to those who didn't even read!
That's the (still quite unrealized) promise of the marriage of broadband.. *rich* media, TCP-IP and distributed hypermedia..
Posted by: Chris | November 17, 2004 at 06:02 AM
I think this is an idea whose time has come. More non-profits need to embrace this concept as a way of keeping in greater touch with the people they serve and the people they wish to attract as donors. While I have a photo/art/literature specific blog called TIFFINBOX (http://www.tiffinbox.org), I helped a non-profit based in India set up a blog called OMLOG (http://www.omlog.org). If there is a push for a "BloggerCorps" please let me know!
Thanks!
Posted by: Seshu | November 17, 2004 at 09:18 AM
Yes!
I've been a blog proseletyzer, but haven't had resources to offer. The structure exists through a couple of existing organizations: techsoup.org and the circuit-riders http://tinyurl.com/4eotv. The latter group already helps non-profits to plan and implement technology projects, so is a perfect match.
Posted by: Mark | November 17, 2004 at 10:50 AM
Yes, awesome idea!
If my advice means anything, I think it would be best to keep it as open as possible, not just to groups that want to save the entire world. Who knows, once small groups are able to get together, some of them just might.
Make sense? Obviously users should have some sort of a higher purpose, but not everybody is going to be blogging for Peace in the Middle East, for example. :-)
-Brian
Posted by: theyeti | November 19, 2004 at 08:41 AM
And why stop at a text blog?
i work with a group og bloggers that are coming together to put video into our blogs.
http://videoblogging.info
Especially for non-profit groups, if you can SHOW people what youre trying to do...its much more effective.
Basically its could be like http://witness.org...but in a blog.
Let us know if you want help.
we're teaching indivdual people as they come...but we live all over(im in NYC) and one of us may be where a group needs some hand-on training.
Jay
Posted by: Jay Dedman | November 20, 2004 at 11:47 AM
thank you
Posted by: ali | December 05, 2004 at 09:42 AM
How can www.SaveAslave.com be bloged?
Posted by: Marty | December 11, 2004 at 08:08 AM
Thanks, nice
Posted by: buy cialis generic | September 16, 2005 at 06:24 PM
Helpful
Posted by: penis enlargement | March 13, 2006 at 10:05 PM
Let me point out that You have a Great blog.
Posted by: Lilly | April 13, 2006 at 11:01 AM