links for 2006-01-31
-
"According to an e-mail that just showed up in my inbox, the folks at Anonymizer (the company that, at your request, makes your Internet usage untraceable to you) will be rising to the defense of the Chinese people by providing them with an anti-censorshi
-
“If the system favors people who make the wrong ethical choices shouldn’t the system be attacked with more fervor then the people?”
-
"How can Google possibly reduce, if not make up for, the damage it has done?"
-
"So what are Chinese censors concerned about? It’s not sex."
-
To help understand how the results of Google.com and Google.cn differ, the OpenNet Initiative has assembled a tool that lets you simultaneously compare search results.
-
"It took Google (Profile, Products, Articles) Inc. more than a year to make the decision that offering a censored version of its search services in China would be a lesser evil than boycotting business in the country altogether, according to Google Inc. C
-
Microsoft revamps blogging policy | InfoWorld | News | 2006-01-31 | By Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service"After outrage from many of its own employees over its abrupt censoring of a Chinese blogger, Microsoft has formulated a new policy to deal with requests from a government that alleges posted material violates its laws."
-
"So how did the NY Times fare against blogs? Not very well. For eight top news stories of 2005, blogs were listed in Google search results before the Times six times, the Times only twice."
-
"Users in the West may not desert them, but a billion soon-to-be-online Chinese will forever associate Google with lame and censored search results - tools of the state. That just dumb. And totally uncool."
Comments