David Schlesinger, global managing editor and head of editorial operations for Reuters, has written an Op-Ed in the International Herald Tribune: The reality behind 'Easongate' . He does not believe U.S. troops target journalists on purpose. But he believes that there is a serious problem, which the latest Italian death has tragically underscored. He writes:
My own company, Reuters, has lost three colleagues in Iraq, and each time it has been in an unfortunate encounter with U.S. troops. Do I believe my colleagues were targeted? No. Do I believe that the military and we have done enough to ensure that these horrible accidents won't be repeated? Alas, the answer to that question is no as well.
He concludes:
I don't want the controversy over Eason Jordan's remarks to counteract his important contribution to keeping journalists safe. I want all combatants to recognize the important, objective role journalists play as noncombatants.
I want continued engagement with the Pentagon to minimize the chances of a journalist being killed by U.S. fire again. I want fast, objective investigations into journalists' deaths, so that we all can learn the lessons..
I want never to have to report the death of a colleague from an avoidable accident again.
Claims by Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena that she and her rescuer were deliberately targeted are indeed absurd. The U.S. military may feel that its troops did nothing inappropriate or unexpected given the circumstances. But unfortunately, these journalist deaths are creating growing tensions between global media organizations and the U.S. military. The result is not in the U.S. military's interest, or in U.S. foreign policy interests more broadly. Something needs to be done. Questioning the patriotism of news executives won't make the problem go away.
Urban Guerilla Warfare.
The ritual killing, religion affiliated death cult called the Insurgency has killed many Iraqi civilians and Gov't officials.
Maybe Reuters could focus on the Rules of Engagement by the Insurgents. Maybe for a year or two.
By Andrew Marshall
BAGHDAD (Reuters)
(already implicated , embarrassment , controversy, over-zealous)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/nm/20050307/wl_nm/iraq_dc
Posted by: ROE | March 08, 2005 at 03:56 PM
Rebecca: "But unfortunately, these journalist deaths are creating growing tensions between global media organizations and the U.S. military."
Do you think that these deaths are affecting news coverage out of Iraq? Not just American but others as well.
If so, can you point to a shift in coverage as a result of these deaths?
Since 5 times as many journalists and media workers have been killed by terrorists and and insurgents in Iraq, can you contrast the effect in the coverage?
Thanks!
Posted by: Sisyphus | March 08, 2005 at 04:34 PM
there is a real fog of war here
-r
Posted by: rony | March 09, 2005 at 02:43 AM
Something I'd like to offer, food for thought, when consider journalists' framing of this issue (ties to ROE's comment):
The Calculus of Insurgency
Do you have thoughts on the media variable (local, national, international) in this calculus?
It exists. It has a value. What is it?
Posted by: Sisyphus | March 09, 2005 at 11:29 AM