Like many people now in their
mid-to-late 30’s, I grew up hearing a lot about “Vietnam,” the war. I was
practically born in the middle of anti-war protests in Berkeley,
California. Family legend has it I came close to being trampled by a mounted
policeman at some anti-Vietnam war demonstration. (Probably the first of several
reasons I don’t like being at demonstrations.) The first news story I can
remember was Walter Cronkite with news from the Vietnam war. I went to high
school and college with children of Vietnam war veterans and children of
Vietnamese refugees. One of my good friends in college left Vietnam with her
family as a six-year old when Saigon fell in 1975. Her parents had worked for
the South Vietnamese regime. She and her two sisters – all three of whom went to
Harvard – are brilliant and beautiful and strong-willed. “Vietnam,” has shaped
the lives of at least two generations of Americans. The last presidential
election was (ridiculously, in my view) dominated by arguments over the
candidates’ Vietnam war service records. “Vietnam” keyword searches on news
websites these days tend to turn up large numbers of stories on Iraq and U.S.
politics. We know a lot about “Vietnam,” the war and the era. We Americans know
very little about “Vietnam” in 2005, a place where more than 82 million people
now live.
Here are some of the things I learned about Vietnam:
The Vietnamese communist party is considering changing its name to the "Labor Party," or something along those lines. Several people told me this. They’re thinking about doing this for several reasons: First, the change would make relations with other countries (especially the United States) less ideologiclly loaded. In other words, Vietnam could do much to solve its “branding” problem if it stopped calling itself “Communist” – when it is in fact better described as some kind of socialist-capitalist hybrid nationalist-authoritarian thing. (A description that fits China better than “communism” too… some reformers in China have also raised the idea of changing the party’s name, but nobody seriously thinks that will happen any time soon.) Second, the reasoning goes, the leader of Vietnam’s revolution, Ho Chi Minh, was primarily a nationalist anyway: communism turned out to be the most expeditious vehicle by which to rid his country of foreign occupation. Vietnamese who support the name change idea hope it will happen within the next year or so. How likely is it really? Hard to say. There are plenty of old-time war veterans in the party who don’t like the idea. And foreign diplomats and businesspeople point out that re-branding Vietnam won’t change its diplomatic and trade relations all that much as long as the Vietnam’s political system remains the same and trade regulations remain too murky for foreign companies to feel confident they’ll make money in Vietnam. But still, people I spoke with seemed to think there’s a much greater chance of the Vietnamese Communist Party changing its name than the Chinese. So that’s interesting.
The Generation gap is tremendous, and could cause the country to
change quickly. More than half the population is
under 30. They know nothing of war. They like Americans. You can get around
speaking in English in Hanoi in Saigon much better than in Beijing and Tokyo. At
Vietnamnet, the online newspaper
I visited, most of the employees are in their 20’s. I’m told this is common in
many Vietnamese companies. Keeping this generation under ideological control
strikes me as pretty tough. At the same time, given the amount of war and
trauma the country has been through, we can expect the country’s leaders to keep
Vietnam a one-party authoritarian state for a while. They may pull it off if
they can keep the economy growing fast enough that the young people can get
enough job opportunities and standards of living can continue to rise. (Sounds
like the Chinese government’s main challenge too…) Which is why Vietnam is
trying to get into the World Trade Organization, so it can make itself more
attractive to foreign investment. The scuttlebutt is that China wants to delay
Vietnam’s entry because that would mean more competition for investment. Which
leads us to point number three…
Many Vietnamese really don’t trust the Chinese, and see the U.S.
as an important counter-weight to Chinese power in Southeast
Asia. China occupied Vietnam in ancient times. (Many Vietnamese still revere the
Chinese sage Confucius, and burn incense to his statue in Hanoi.) The Chinese
and Vietnamese fought a border war in the early 80’s. As one Vietnamese friend
put it: “The Chinese want all their neighbors to be weak.” But the relationship
is complicated. There are factions within the Vietnamese government and party
who prefer to be close to China, and others who prefer to improve relations with
the United States. The net effect will probably be that Vietnam will play China
and the U.S. off against each other, since it certainly can’t afford to be on
bad terms with either great power.
Really interesting stuff. Did you find an entrepreneurial spirit there, compared to all the other places you've been? Based on a friend's account and yours, I get that impression.
Posted by: AF | April 24, 2005 at 10:57 AM
Rebecca-
You truly have a wonderful blog. Interesting and mind-expanding: what journalism really ought to be. It's been fascinating to read about your travels because of the way you manage to give a feel for the places you've been. Your pictures are very useful for that too.
However, the main reason I wanted to comment was to say that I've been tickled to make use of some of the nifty gizmos I first saw on your blog, and to thank you for how easy you make this. (eg the Flickr Zeitgeist photo thingy) Your links have been at least as useful as your blog itself. Great job.
Posted by: quixote http://acid-test.blogspot.com/ | April 26, 2005 at 09:26 PM
Excellent blog, Rebecca. As expected. Made my way here via noodlepie.
In response to AF, I am currently based in Saigon and think there's a definite entrepreneurial spirit.
For example, just down the street, there's a new shop selling clothes for plus-size women. Clever for the present because most shops here carry sizes too small for the average tourist. And they are probably looking to the future too because McDonald's is slated to enter the Vietnam market either this year or sometime soon. The resulting growth in size of the local population is a given.
The wealthy are opening branches selling luxury or high-end goods like Furla (newly opened this month) in anticipation of socioeconomic growth. Ordinary citizens have the spirit too. I taught my domestic helper how to make pizza and her crust is now even better than what's available in the restaurants here. She has plans to open a pizza joint for locals (maybe as street food). I may invest.
Posted by: Cottontimer | April 27, 2005 at 07:03 AM
Rebecca:
Really enjoyed this post! Vietnam is for many of my generation frozen in time -- a very painful time. It is tribute to the Vietnamese that they have moved on so successfully. The photo's are beautiful.
Thanks,
Amanda
Posted by: Amanda Watlington | May 03, 2005 at 11:29 AM
Great site. I really like your commentary about the present political conditions in contemporary Vietnam. I really hope the country change. The people really do deserve so much better!
Posted by: Sidney Tran | June 23, 2005 at 03:07 PM