« The Yahoo! lawsuit: picking through Chinese and English legal documents | Main | links for 2007-04-21 »

April 20, 2007

Comments

mahathir_fan

"Communist Party journals and the state-run news media have published a stream of commentaries by retired officials and academics on “political system reform” and the need for “socialist democracy,”"

A Communist State is theoretically achieved only when it functions as a democracy. If a self proclaimed Communist state is not democratic, then it is actually not a Communist State but exist in name only.

Where else but in a Communist state can you find places named like "Liberation Street" or "Freedom Square" or "People's Square" - all words that reflect Democracy. Only in Communist nations. When one studies the theory of Communism one will see that Communism IS Democracy.

The perfect implementation of Communism must reflect democracy, otherwise it is not really a Communist state.

mahathir_fan

Therefore the West shouldn't harbour illusions that given China's elite are accepting democracy that a "Gorbachov" figure would rise up to topple Communism.

The rise of democracy is absolutely consistent with the development of Communism. Democracy is power to the people and Marx once said, "Workers of the world arise". Workers are usually the largest segment of the population. So both theories want power to go to the largest segment of the population.

Even Adolf Hitler who is an anti communist once remarked that the danger of Communism is that it is Democratic when he summarizes his study of Communism in Mein Kampf Chapter 2: "The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of ail recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet."


In fact, it is actually ironic that Capitalism countries could be considered Democratic. In Capitalist nations, you have places named after corporations: like stadiums like Enron Field.

My explanation is that capitalist nations are democratic only on Election day or certain other days. The rest of the time, they serve the capitalists. As a result, the people living in Capitalist nations "think" they live in a democracy by drawing examples from days in which the nation is Democratic eg. Election Day.


The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Global Voices


  • Global Voices Online - The world is talking. Are you listening?

  • Donate to Global Voices - Help us spread the word
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2004

license

My book:

Consent of the Networked
Coming January 31st, 2012, from Basic Books. To pre-order click here.
AddThis Feed Button