The Global Network Initiative

After more than two years of work behind closed doors, the Global Network Initiative is launching this week. That's the corporate code of conduct on free speech and privacy I've been talking about in generalities for quite some time. By midnight Tuesday U.S. East Coast time, the full set of documents and list of initial signatories will be made publicly available at globalnetworkinitiative.org.  UPDATE (noon HKT): the site is now live.

On that website you'll be able to read the full text of the Principles on free expression and privacy. A group of companies including Yahoo!, Google, and Microsoft, human rights organizations, socially responsible investment funds, academics, and free speech groups spent the last two-plus years reaching agreement on what should go into that document. There will also be a Governance Charter and a set of Implementation Guidelines giving more detail on how companies should adhere to the core principles. There will be an FAQ, list of participants, and contact people for the organizations that have joined the Global Network Initiative so far. The hope is that many more companies, NGOs, investment funds, and academic institutions around the world will join in the coming months.

The initial plan was to release the news so that the first news reports about the initiative would come out closer to the website's unveiling at 12:01am Wednesday EDT or 12:01pm HKT. But the story leaked early and the San Francisco Chronicle reported it on Monday without any comment from the participants who had all agreed not to talk until the official launch. Since then, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, WSJ China Blog, the AP, AFP and others have reported the story with remarks from some of the participants. We can expect more coverage in the next 24 hours. UPDATE: The BBC has a good story with lots of quotes from participants.

A few people have called me asking "does this thing have any teeth" or "is this thing more than just a figleaf for companies to get congress off their backs?" 

Organizations like Human Rights Watch, Human Rights in China, Human Rights First, and the Committee to Protect Journalists would not be putting their reputations behind this thing if they didn't think it was meaningful.

That said, the initiative must prove its value in the next couple of years by implementing a meaningful and sufficiently tough process by which companies' adherence to the principles will be evaluated and benchmarked. If there is a rigorous process that rates the companies' behavior, then investors who care about social responsibility, and users who want to know how trustworthy a given company is compared to others, can make more informed choices.

The initiative is based on the reality that there is pretty much no country on earth - including the United States - where governments aren't pressuring telecoms and Internet companies to do things that potentially violate users' rights to privacy and free expression. Companies must consider the right to free expression and privacy of users in all markets to be part and parcel of what it means to be socially responsible. Part of the problem is that many telecoms and Internet companies just have not been thinking through these issues as they roll out products and services around the globe, resulting in all kinds of unintended consequences - the TOM-Skype fiasco in which Skype's Chinese business partner was found to have allowed a huge security breach being the latest example. The Initiative is about getting companies to think ahead and incorporate human rights assessments into new product plans or plans to enter new markets. It's also about being more transparent and honest with your users about what's being censored, why and how, and informing them about how and with whom their personal data is being stored and shared. That way, users can make informed choices about how and when it is safe or reliable to use these services - or not.

As critics point out, the initiative stops short at making companies pledge to commit civil disobedience, break local laws, or to pull out of markets at a certain prescribed point. Depending on where you stand, you might consider this a strength or a weakness. The initiative is focused specifically on how to engage in markets around the world while doing everything you can to avoid causing harm to users and customers. It won't on its own stop governments (of any given ideology or political system) from doing bad things to their own citizens. If it's successful, however, it will help companies who truly care about their users to think ahead about how they can avoid acting as an un-transparent and un-accountable extensions of government abuse. Whether even such a modest success can be achieved will require a lot of work from all the organizations who have already signed on and who may sign on in the future. NGO's, investors, human rights organizations, user groups, and academics need to make sure that the companies' performance on matters related to free speech and privacy is evaluated in a rigorous and meaningful way. I hope that groups around the world will not only insist but help to make sure that this initiative will be much more than a fig leaf.

Comments

[Dwight Hines]

I keep earning error messages when I try to subscribe to this (your) Rconversation:
Error message is:
The page cannot be displayed

The page you are looking for cannot be displayed because an invalid method (HTTP verb) was used to attempt access.
Please try the following:

Contact the Web site administrator if you believe that this request should be allowed.
Make sure that the Web site address displayed in the address bar of your browser is spelled and formatted correctly.
HTTP Error 405 - The HTTP verb used to access this page is not allowed.
Internet Information Services (IIS)

Technical Information (for support personnel)

Go to Microsoft Product Support Services and perform a title search for the words HTTP and 405.
Open IIS Help, which is accessible in IIS Manager (inetmgr), and search for topics titled Setting Application Mappings, Securing Your Site with Web Site Permissions, and About Custom Error Messages."

Please let me know when it is fixed or subscribe me to the digest email version.
Thank you,
dh

[Rebecca MacKinnon]

DH, thanks for the heads up about the technical problem. The rss-to-email service I was using, RMail, appears to be down. I've now switched to Feedburner, which should work fine.

[TP Lin]

Dear Professor MacKinnon,

I read your blog regularly and respect what you have done for China's freedom of speech.

I am from Taiwan. Taiwanese people fought for their basic human rights for decades and earned what they deserved. Taiwan's democracy was once the glory of this state.

However, the status quo changed. After President Ma Ying-jeou's aggressive attempt to improve cross-strait relations with China, Taiwan's democracy and freedom of expression retreated. Some observers believe the improved cross-strait relations are at a cost to Taiwan's liberty.

If you do more research on recent Taiwan events, you might discover that many cases revealed Taiwan's democracy recession during past 6 months. It could be a warning sign for East Asia's human rights outlook.

I found your article about "The Global Network Initiative" signed by major US companies like Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft. I urge that the GNI must be implemented to the country level, but not just sit on their headquarters.

In a recent case happened in Taiwan, Yahoo! Taiwan shut down a personal blog, Mango Daily, that voices for Taiwan's democracy. It's ironic that Yahoo! Taiwan did this after they signed the Global Network Initiative.

I hope my opinion can catch your attention on Taiwan's democracy recession. Taiwanese people need more support than ever to protect their freedom of expression.

Best regards,
TP Lin (tipping888 鐵平)

http://focusontaiwan.blogspot.com/